WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ON THE TENTH AMENDMENT OF THE US CONSTITUTION
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2018 12:44 am
NOW THE US CONSTITUTION IS THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND , SEE ARTICLE VI PARA II U.S. CONSTITUTTION AND MARBURY VS MADISON 5 U.S. 137 (1803), SO THE IT IS WELL ESTABLISHED THAT YOUR CONSTITUTION IS A VALID DOCUMENT AND YOUR RIGHTS ON IT ARE VALID AND MARBURY VS. MADISON 5 US 137 (1803) HOLDS THAT YOU HAVE AN ABSOLUTE RIGHT TO A REMEDY TO HAVE YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS HONORED EXACTLY AS ORIGINALLY WRITTEN
NOW IF THAT PREMIS IS TRUE YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO HAVE THE COURT ENFORCE YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS IN YOUR FAVOR. PLEASE SEE 16TH AMERICAN JURIS PRUDENCE 2 nd SECTION 97 AND BYARS VS. UNITED STATES 273 U.S. 28 , THE CONSTITUTION IS TO BE INTERPRETED IN FAVOR OF THE CLEARLY INTENDED AND EXPRESSLY DESIGNATED BENIFICIARYS THE CITIZEN FOR THE PROTECTION OF RIGHTS AND OR PROPERTY. SO IT MUST BE ENFORCED IN YOUR FAVOR. SO YOU GOT A RIGGHT TO BE WRONG AND THEY STILL MUST RULE IN YOUR FAVOR AS THE BENEFICIARY OF THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT.
NOW IN THE CASE OF FLOOD VS. KUHN, 407 US 258 IT HOLDS THE PREMISIS THAT ALL THESE CASES IN THE LAW LIBRARY ARE THERE TO PRESERVVE THE STARAE DECISIS AND RECORDS OF A PARTICULAR DECISION AND RESERVE A PRINCIPAL IN LAW FOR FUTURE USE IN SYMILAR FURTHER ARGUMENTS OF SIMILAR NATURE, AND IF YOU HAVE A CASE WITH A LEGAL PRESCIDENT IT MUST BE HELD IN YOUR FAVOR IN STARAE DECISIS, SEE BYARS VS UNITED STATES SUPRA AND 16 AM JURIS PRUDENCE SECTION 97 THE CONSTITUTION MUST BE INTERPRETED IN FAVOR OF THE CITIZAN FOR THE PROTECTION OF RIGHTS AND OR PROPERTY, AS THE NON PREPAYOR OF THE CONTRACT AND YOU ARE THE BENIFICIARY OF THE CONTRACT.
NEXT YOU RELIED ON THE 9 JUSTICES OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT SEE U.S. VS .BISHOP 412 US 346, I HAVE A PERFECT DEFENSE BY MY RELIANCE ON THOSE SUPREME COURT JUSTICES TEACHINGS AND NO CLAIMANT CAN DENY ME MY HONEST RELIENCE ON THOSE SUPREME COURT JUSTICES TEACHINGS.
NOW LASTLY I RELY TOTALLY ON MY TENTH AMENDMENT , U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND I HOLD ALL THE POWERS ON GRANT FORM, ME, THE CITIZEN BENIFICIARY, AND I ORDER THIS HONORABLE COURT TO DISMISS ENTIRELY THIS FRAUDULENT AND S,!PURRIOUS COMPLAINT I CLAIM THIS ON MY TENTH AMENDMENT U.S. CONSTITUTION. IT IS MY ABSOLUTE RIGHT AND I CLAIM THAT TENTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO ORDER THIS ORDER FOR DISMISSAL. NOW STAND YOUR GROUND AND LOOK UP 16 AMERICAN JURIS PRUDENCE 2nd SECTION 177 SEE BOYD VS. UNITED STATES AND NORTON VS. SHELBY COUNTY ALABAMA AND THE COURT NEEDS TO TAKE CARE OF THIS MATTER IMMEDIATELY. I PRAY FOR THE JUST RELIEF OF THIS HONORABLE COURT TO PROTECT ALL MY BASIC CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS IN FAVOR OF ME PER COHEN VS. VIRGINIA 6 WHEAT 2 (1821) I THANK THE COURT FOR YOUR VALUABLE TIME!! THANK YOU!!!!!
Written by Carl E. Miller
NOW IF THAT PREMIS IS TRUE YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO HAVE THE COURT ENFORCE YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS IN YOUR FAVOR. PLEASE SEE 16TH AMERICAN JURIS PRUDENCE 2 nd SECTION 97 AND BYARS VS. UNITED STATES 273 U.S. 28 , THE CONSTITUTION IS TO BE INTERPRETED IN FAVOR OF THE CLEARLY INTENDED AND EXPRESSLY DESIGNATED BENIFICIARYS THE CITIZEN FOR THE PROTECTION OF RIGHTS AND OR PROPERTY. SO IT MUST BE ENFORCED IN YOUR FAVOR. SO YOU GOT A RIGGHT TO BE WRONG AND THEY STILL MUST RULE IN YOUR FAVOR AS THE BENEFICIARY OF THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT.
NOW IN THE CASE OF FLOOD VS. KUHN, 407 US 258 IT HOLDS THE PREMISIS THAT ALL THESE CASES IN THE LAW LIBRARY ARE THERE TO PRESERVVE THE STARAE DECISIS AND RECORDS OF A PARTICULAR DECISION AND RESERVE A PRINCIPAL IN LAW FOR FUTURE USE IN SYMILAR FURTHER ARGUMENTS OF SIMILAR NATURE, AND IF YOU HAVE A CASE WITH A LEGAL PRESCIDENT IT MUST BE HELD IN YOUR FAVOR IN STARAE DECISIS, SEE BYARS VS UNITED STATES SUPRA AND 16 AM JURIS PRUDENCE SECTION 97 THE CONSTITUTION MUST BE INTERPRETED IN FAVOR OF THE CITIZAN FOR THE PROTECTION OF RIGHTS AND OR PROPERTY, AS THE NON PREPAYOR OF THE CONTRACT AND YOU ARE THE BENIFICIARY OF THE CONTRACT.
NEXT YOU RELIED ON THE 9 JUSTICES OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT SEE U.S. VS .BISHOP 412 US 346, I HAVE A PERFECT DEFENSE BY MY RELIANCE ON THOSE SUPREME COURT JUSTICES TEACHINGS AND NO CLAIMANT CAN DENY ME MY HONEST RELIENCE ON THOSE SUPREME COURT JUSTICES TEACHINGS.
NOW LASTLY I RELY TOTALLY ON MY TENTH AMENDMENT , U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND I HOLD ALL THE POWERS ON GRANT FORM, ME, THE CITIZEN BENIFICIARY, AND I ORDER THIS HONORABLE COURT TO DISMISS ENTIRELY THIS FRAUDULENT AND S,!PURRIOUS COMPLAINT I CLAIM THIS ON MY TENTH AMENDMENT U.S. CONSTITUTION. IT IS MY ABSOLUTE RIGHT AND I CLAIM THAT TENTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO ORDER THIS ORDER FOR DISMISSAL. NOW STAND YOUR GROUND AND LOOK UP 16 AMERICAN JURIS PRUDENCE 2nd SECTION 177 SEE BOYD VS. UNITED STATES AND NORTON VS. SHELBY COUNTY ALABAMA AND THE COURT NEEDS TO TAKE CARE OF THIS MATTER IMMEDIATELY. I PRAY FOR THE JUST RELIEF OF THIS HONORABLE COURT TO PROTECT ALL MY BASIC CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS IN FAVOR OF ME PER COHEN VS. VIRGINIA 6 WHEAT 2 (1821) I THANK THE COURT FOR YOUR VALUABLE TIME!! THANK YOU!!!!!
Written by Carl E. Miller