The Anti-Government Movement Guidebook written by Attorneys
-
Destry
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1530
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2018 11:38 pm
- County: Fairbanks
- Your State: Alive
- Contact:
The Anti-Government Movement Guidebook written by Attorneys
.
“First, let no one rule your mind or body. Take special care that your thoughts remain unfettered... . Give men your ear, but not your heart. Show respect for those in power, but don't follow them blindly. Judge with logic and reason, but comment not. Consider none your superior whatever their rank or station in life. Treat all fairly, or they will seek revenge. Be careful with your money. Hold fast to your beliefs and others will listen.”
“Wise? No, I simply learned to think.”
“Wise? No, I simply learned to think.”
Re: The Anti-Government Movement Guidebook written by Attorneys
The Anatomy of an Economic Cartel: How the Legal Guild (BAR) Captured the American Republic Form of Government.
The reason court administrators, bar lawyers, and federal agencies rely on complex code manuals like 'The Anti-Government Movement
Guidebook" instead of trying to pass clear, outright bans is because they cannot win a direct constitutional debate with the American public.
Instead, they weaponize administrative state rules for me but not for thee and drive the claimant to exhaustion.
Association of Court Clerks
The National Center for State Courts (NCSC)—which represents the collective leadership of state judges, court managers, and court clerks—hired specialized researchers to author 'The Anti-Government Movement Guidebook". The primary driving force behind creating it was the Association of Court Clerks and administrators nationwide, who wanted an operational "playbook" on how to handle the public/people/groups in bringing traditional/historic court paperwork to the front desk.
Court administrators and clerks are the exact group that commissioned and distributed The Anti-Government Movement Guidebook.
the structural reality is that the data collected by court administrators feeds directly into "national law enforcement databases", which federal agencies use to track and profile specific movements.The transition from a court clerk's front desk to federal tracking operates through several established systems.
1. The Real Mechanism:
The JTTF and Shared Databases
Court administrators do not need to keep a hidden list because any non-standard legal filing that crosses into what they define as a "threat" or "fraudulent lien" is routed into standardized law enforcement networks:
Joint Terrorism Task Forces (JTTFs):
Created to merge local law enforcement, state courts, and federal agencies, JTTFs share intelligence on groups they label domestic extremists [TMPA.COPS].
Law Enforcement Enterprise Portal (LEEP):
When a court clerk flags a document for using common-law language, that information can be logged into shared law enforcement networks, effectively creating a digital trail accessible to any officer or agent nationwide.
House Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government was specifically formed to investigate instances where the FBI, DOJ, and other federal bodies allegedly targeted regular Americans for their political, religious, or constitutional beliefs. Investigations have focused on:
The Profiling of Dissent
federal analysts suggested monitoring traditional religious groups or parents speaking out at local school board meetings, labeling their grievances as potential security threats.
The Use of "Private Contractors"
purchasing data from private intelligence firms and corporate data brokers who track political speech online.
The Bar Association’s Institutional Shield
While bar associations do not operate physical "hit squads," they function as a powerful cartel that protects the state's legal monopoly. Suppressing Competition: The bar uses "Unauthorized Practice of Law" (UPL) statutes to aggressively shut down any non-lawyer or common-law advocate who tries to help the common man or woman defend themselves in court.
The BAR makes it a crime for anyone who is not an active, licensed member of a State Bar Association to give legal advice, draft legal documents, or represent someone else in court.
"Selective overcriminalization Consequences".
This means that if a public official engages in misfeasance or deprives the people of their rights, the legal system makes it nearly impossible for an ordinary American to sue them or hold them personally accountable.
History Forward March unlike the sin of complacency in past generation. These words cut straight to the core of the "danger" Sheldon Wolin warned about.
The foundational principle of the U.S. Constitution is that the federal government possesses only "enumerated powers"—meaning if the Constitution does not explicitly grant a specific power to the government, the government does not legally have it.
The Original Scope: The federal government was originally limited to core national duties like national defense, coining money, and managing foreign treaties.
Current Diagnosis for our Justice System: Administrative Despotism.
"network of small complicated rules, minute and uniform," that breaks the spirit of the people and turns them into a flock of timid animals, with the government as their shepherd.
Inverted Totalitarianism:
Coined by political theorist Sheldon Wolin, this describes a system where the state uses corporate management, endless legal codes, and media gatekeepers to completely neutralize the political power of the public.
Reference:
https://forums.national-assembly.net/search.php?keywords=The+Anti-Government+Movement+Guidebook%22&terms=all&author=&sc=1&sf=all&sr=posts&sk=t&sd=d&st=0&ch=300&t=0&submit=Search
Project MUSE - Democracy Incorporated https://share.google/WHMI8V1xHjFveNixO
Oppinions & written blog expressed Nancy W.
The reason court administrators, bar lawyers, and federal agencies rely on complex code manuals like 'The Anti-Government Movement
Guidebook" instead of trying to pass clear, outright bans is because they cannot win a direct constitutional debate with the American public.
Instead, they weaponize administrative state rules for me but not for thee and drive the claimant to exhaustion.
Association of Court Clerks
The National Center for State Courts (NCSC)—which represents the collective leadership of state judges, court managers, and court clerks—hired specialized researchers to author 'The Anti-Government Movement Guidebook". The primary driving force behind creating it was the Association of Court Clerks and administrators nationwide, who wanted an operational "playbook" on how to handle the public/people/groups in bringing traditional/historic court paperwork to the front desk.
Court administrators and clerks are the exact group that commissioned and distributed The Anti-Government Movement Guidebook.
the structural reality is that the data collected by court administrators feeds directly into "national law enforcement databases", which federal agencies use to track and profile specific movements.The transition from a court clerk's front desk to federal tracking operates through several established systems.
1. The Real Mechanism:
The JTTF and Shared Databases
Court administrators do not need to keep a hidden list because any non-standard legal filing that crosses into what they define as a "threat" or "fraudulent lien" is routed into standardized law enforcement networks:
Joint Terrorism Task Forces (JTTFs):
Created to merge local law enforcement, state courts, and federal agencies, JTTFs share intelligence on groups they label domestic extremists [TMPA.COPS].
Law Enforcement Enterprise Portal (LEEP):
When a court clerk flags a document for using common-law language, that information can be logged into shared law enforcement networks, effectively creating a digital trail accessible to any officer or agent nationwide.
House Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government was specifically formed to investigate instances where the FBI, DOJ, and other federal bodies allegedly targeted regular Americans for their political, religious, or constitutional beliefs. Investigations have focused on:
The Profiling of Dissent
federal analysts suggested monitoring traditional religious groups or parents speaking out at local school board meetings, labeling their grievances as potential security threats.
The Use of "Private Contractors"
purchasing data from private intelligence firms and corporate data brokers who track political speech online.
The Bar Association’s Institutional Shield
While bar associations do not operate physical "hit squads," they function as a powerful cartel that protects the state's legal monopoly. Suppressing Competition: The bar uses "Unauthorized Practice of Law" (UPL) statutes to aggressively shut down any non-lawyer or common-law advocate who tries to help the common man or woman defend themselves in court.
The BAR makes it a crime for anyone who is not an active, licensed member of a State Bar Association to give legal advice, draft legal documents, or represent someone else in court.
"Selective overcriminalization Consequences".
This means that if a public official engages in misfeasance or deprives the people of their rights, the legal system makes it nearly impossible for an ordinary American to sue them or hold them personally accountable.
History Forward March unlike the sin of complacency in past generation. These words cut straight to the core of the "danger" Sheldon Wolin warned about.
The foundational principle of the U.S. Constitution is that the federal government possesses only "enumerated powers"—meaning if the Constitution does not explicitly grant a specific power to the government, the government does not legally have it.
The Original Scope: The federal government was originally limited to core national duties like national defense, coining money, and managing foreign treaties.
Current Diagnosis for our Justice System: Administrative Despotism.
"network of small complicated rules, minute and uniform," that breaks the spirit of the people and turns them into a flock of timid animals, with the government as their shepherd.
Inverted Totalitarianism:
Coined by political theorist Sheldon Wolin, this describes a system where the state uses corporate management, endless legal codes, and media gatekeepers to completely neutralize the political power of the public.
Reference:
https://forums.national-assembly.net/search.php?keywords=The+Anti-Government+Movement+Guidebook%22&terms=all&author=&sc=1&sf=all&sr=posts&sk=t&sd=d&st=0&ch=300&t=0&submit=Search
Project MUSE - Democracy Incorporated https://share.google/WHMI8V1xHjFveNixO
Oppinions & written blog expressed Nancy W.
well stated